HD Streaming Comparison: Amazon, IDAGIO, Qobuz, Spotify …
2020年3月1日 · 5. Amazon HD 6 Tidal Round 5: Qobuz vs Primephonic: Sound quality: A Primephonic's sound quality was quite good, but Qobuz' sound quality was still noticeably better. Qobuz provides more presence around instruments and voices while Primephonic, though good, tends to sound more 2-dimensional in its sound quality.
One man's Amazon HD vs Tidal impressions - Head-Fi.org
2021年5月10日 · 16. Hi everyone, I have just started my trial with Amazon HD after about a year of using Tidal. Here is my brief head-to-head set of impressions, with some questions about others’ impressions and thoughts. This is done not blinded, simply switching back and forth on the same song between the two applications, but I had pretty good equipoise ...
Sound quality between Amazon Music HD / Qobuz / Tidal
2020年1月21日 · For available library, 1. Amazon Music HD, 2. Tidal HiFi, 3. Qobuz. Just randomly searching for sometimes lesser know albums from 60's through the present, I was more likely to find what I was looking for on Amazon Music HD, with the most "missing" selections with Qobuz. I found Tidal to have a library just a bit behind Amazon Music HD.
Sound quality between Amazon Music HD / Qobuz / Tidal
2020年1月21日 · Headphones: Sennheiser HD 540 Reference Gold 600ohm, 540 reference gold 300ohm, 540 reference 2, Sennheiser HD 560 Ovation, Sennheiser HD 250 Linear 600ohm, Sennheiser hd 480 classic A real Hifi system is always superior experience to …
Sound quality between Amazon Music HD / Qobuz / Tidal
2020年1月21日 · Amazon: Sounds more flat. Less drive than Qobuz so that some music sounds like it is plodding along. Sound is less full. Amazon HD doesn't necessarily do anything wrong (as does Tidal), but also clearly not as good as Qobuz to my ears. Qobuz: Much more presence than Amazon HD. More 3-dimensional. Better pace and drive.
Tidal's 1411 kbps "lossless" vs. Amazon's 850 kbps "lossless"?
2017年10月21日 · With the news of Apple Lossless announcing today and Amazon Music HD’s price drop last week, there’s a lot of good competition going around! What confuses me is, both AMHD and Tidal advertise the same 16-bit/44.1 kHz, but Tidal advertises their quality as 1411 kbps and AMHD advertises their...
Qobuz/Audirvana vs Amazon Music HD - Head-Fi.org
2012年7月29日 · That acknowledged, to me there seems to be a noticeable audio quality difference between them. Amazon Music HD sounds terrific and it's user interface is MUCH better than the often frusting Qobuz/Audirvana. To my ears, Qobuz/Audirvans has a consistently more pleasing audio quality.... slightly better bass response/punch and overall a slight but ...
iBasso Dx220 and Tidal and Amazon Music HD - Head-Fi.org
2019年1月15日 · 1) iBasso DX220 and Tidal: I play Tidal on my iBasso DX220 Digital Audio player (DAP). I downloaded an MQA track with the resolution 24/352.8 from the 2L website and the iBasso decoded the MQA tract at 24/352.8. When I play the exact same MQA tract with a resolution of 24/353.8 on Tidal, my player the DX220 player will only decode that track at ...
Amazon Music HD Is Still Lossy - Audiophile Style
2020年10月12日 · Bits and Bytes. Amazon Music HD Is Still Lossy. Just over one year ago Amazon launched its Amazon Music HD streaming service. Many people uninterested in the success of small businesses and good customer service cheered the new offering from the 1.7 Trillion dollar company. At the time Amazon's $14.99 per month plan was the lower than all the ...
Amazon launches Music HD with lossless streaming
2019年4月26日 · When I play Tidal on Audrivana- to my ears it sounds more correct than Amazon HD. However, Tidal does not allow downloads where Amazon does. Now, when I download my Amazon music to my NAS and play from there- Amazon in exclusive mode sounds clearly better than Tidal in Audrivana even when playing in Kernal Streaming mode.