What is the difference between GPS, GNSS and RNAV?
2016年6月9日 · 21. As stated in the othe answers, GPS is the US Global Positioning System. GNSS is an umbrella term that encompasses GPS as well as other nations' satellite systems that achieve essentially the same capability. RNAV is the aircraft capability that allows you to navigate from point to point, defined by Latitude/Longitude and independent of any ...
gnss - What are satellite time, GPS time, and UTC time? - Aviation ...
2021年12月18日 · GPS time is the exact number of seconds since January 6, 1980, at 00:00:00 UTC. Some systems may (incorrectly) represent that as a date and time by assuming days of exactly 86,400 seconds. UTC time truly has two parts: the date and the time within that date. Most days are 86,400 seconds long, but they may occasionally be 86,401 or 86,399 ...
What is the geoid undulation used for in aviation?
2017年9月23日 · GNSS determines a 3D position from satellites, expressed as x,y,z in a Cartesian Earth centered frame. The position is converted into latitude, longitude and h using the ellipsoid model and a polar frame. Optionally H is computed from h using the geoid model. Wording used in aviation for GNSS altitudes
gnss - What is GPS HIL in layman's terms? - Aviation Stack Exchange
2019年12月16日 · GNSS Horizontal Integrity Limit/ Horizontal Protection Level is a measure of GNSS position error/integrity that's very important in RNP operations and RAIM, but it has an obtuse definition in aviation regulations like DO-229D that's hard to apply in practice: [HPL] describes the region assured to contain the indicated horizontal position.
gnss - Difference between accuracy, integrity, availability, …
2024年2月23日 · Stack Exchange Network. Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.
gnss - Why don't planes (mostly airliners) primarily use GPS for ...
2023年9月16日 · Some regulations recommend low end-to-end latency. AC 20-165 for ADS-B recommends total measurement-to-transmission latency of less than 2 seconds, and "uncompensated latency" (e.g. after extrapolation) of less than 0.6 seconds. You bring up lots of other good points like that regulations sometimes require backup in case of loss of GNSS ...
gnss - What are the lateral sensitivities of GPS approaches?
2017年9月13日 · Beginning 2 NM prior to the FAWP, the full scale CDI sensitivity will smoothly change from ±1 NM to ±0.3 NM at the FAWP. As sensitivity changes from ±1 NM to ±0.3 NM approaching the FAWP,…. WAAS on the other hand is similar to the localizer. AIM 1-1-18 (d) 4 Both lateral and vertical scaling for the LNAV/VNAV and LPV approach procedures ...
flight instruments - Aviation Stack Exchange
2022年10月1日 · Stack Exchange Network. Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.
gnss - Why is training regarding the loss of RAIM given so much …
2020年12月2日 · I've noticed a lack of subject matter on the loss of SBAS as compared to RAIM. In the ACS there is mention of RNP, SBAS (WAAS), and RAIM, which are all related, but the available content for RAIM and
gnss - If a GPS displays the correct time, can I trust the calculated ...
2023年6月27日 · Even the PPS output from consumer devices can be wildly out- 10s of mSec- when compared with a precision source (aggregate of multiple GNSS constellations, or an atomic clock transported, as somebody has already said, slowly). In short, you can't trust anything from GPS until the receiver says it can be trusted. $\endgroup$ –